A resolution is defined by s. 166.041(1)(b), F.S., to mean "an expression of a governing body concerning matters of administration, an expression of a temporary character, or a provision for the disposition of a particular item of the administrative business of the governing body." This is consistent with the general statement contained in 62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations s. 411: "A resolution has also been distinguished from an ordinance in that an ordinance is a continuing regulation, a permanent rule of conduct or government, while a resolution ordinarily is an act of a special or temporary character, nor prescribing a permanent rule of government, but is merely declaratory of the will or opinion of a municipal corporation in a given matter, and in the nature of a ministerial or administrative act, and is not a law."
(Attorney General, Ashley Moody website AGO 81-71)
In a deeply polarizing move, the City of Miramar, Florida, has passed a resolution urging a ceasefire in the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. On the surface, the resolution advocates for peace and an end to violence, ostensibly serving as a humanitarian gesture. However, the context, presentation, and individuals involved reveal a much more troubling narrative.
Ignoring Key Facts: A Deceptive Call for Peace
The resolution in question is remarkably one-sided, presenting a narrative that strongly defends Hamas while neglecting the significant terrorism and violence initiated by the group. It notably omits the terror attack on June 7th, 2023, where Hamas launched a brutal series of attacks on Israeli civilians, leading to the current conflict escalation. This glaring omission raises questions about the true intent behind the resolution.
Representative Randy Fine, R-Palm Bay, did not mince words, labeling Miramar Mayor Wayne Messam a “Muslim Terror-sympathizer” and threatening legislative action to revoke the city’s charter. Fine’s reaction, while severe, underscores the gravity of passing such a resolution without a balanced portrayal of events and actors involved in the conflict.
Questionable Advisers and Influences
Equally troubling is the influence behind Mayor Messam's decision. Naima Khan-Ghany, a prominent local figure with documented ties to extremist Muslim organizations, appears to be a significant adviser to the Mayor. Khan-Ghany's connections to groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood have previously led to her removal from positions within the Broward County School district. Her involvement casts a shadow on the motives behind Miramar’s resolution.
Khan-Ghany has been associated with several Islamist groups, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), and Al-Hikmat TV, all of which have ties to extremist ideologies. Such associations fuel speculation and concern over the impartiality and safety of her advisory role in municipal affairs, particularly in resolutions that pertain to international terrorism and conflicts.
A Deceptively Honorable Facade
While the City of Miramar presents its resolution as a commitment to promoting peace, safety, and acceptance, the true narrative appears far murkier. The Mayor claims the resolution does not take a side, but the context and omissions suggest otherwise. The pattern of aligning city policy with Khan-Ghany’s known extremist views further complicates the matter.
The timing of this resolution also raises eyebrows, considering the city's recent move to officiate American Muslim Heritage Month. Such decisions, while seemingly supporting diversity, might camouflage deeper, more concerning ideological influences within city governance.
Need for Transparency and Accountability
Beyond the resolution itself, questions about Mayor Messam’s campaign contributions warrant serious consideration. Given Khan-Ghany’s extremist ties and influence, an investigation into the Mayor’s donors could unveil deeper connections and potential conflicts of interest. Transparency in political contributions is crucial to maintain public trust and ensure governance free from extremist influence.
Conclusion: A Call for Comprehensive Scrutiny
Miramar’s resolution, ostensibly advocating peace, raises significant concerns about partiality, influence, and the veiled agendas of those involved. The involvement of individuals with extremist ties and the omission of critical facts about the conflict present a one-sided narrative that undermines genuine efforts for peace.
Moving forward, it is imperative for the City of Miramar, its leaders, and its advisers to engage transparently, ensuring that resolutions and policies reflect a balanced perspective, free from extremist influences. Only through comprehensive scrutiny and accountability can the city restore public trust and work towards genuine and lasting peace.
Want to support. Rep. Randy Fine, R-Palm Bay? https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/contactmember.aspx?MemberId=4646
More articles on the local tentacles of militant Islam:
Joe Kaufman Security Initiative: https://kaufmansecurity.org
Comments